Nicholas Jovanovski vs Mustafa Ibraimi Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L W L L L
Form
L L L W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Jovanovski 1 - 0 Ibraimi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jovanovski winning 2 and Ibraimi winning 0. The last match between Jovanovski and Ibraimi was at the M25 Bendigo, 27-02-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Nicholas Jovanovski getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicholas Jovanovski | 1 |
| Mustafa Ibraimi | 0 |
M25 Bendigo(27-02-2022)
6
3
6
2
| Jovanovski | Stats | Ibraimi |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 30% (32-73) | Career Total W/L | 41% (28-41) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jovanovski VS Ibraimi H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
Jovanovski VS Ibraimi H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicholas Jovanovski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Daiki Yoshimura
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
view more
Mustafa Ibraimi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-2 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sean Van Rensburg
Player
Mustafa Ibraimi
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Mustafa Ibraimi
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Mustafa Ibraimi
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(9) 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30% (32/73) | Win/Loss | 41% (28/41) |
| 34% (80/153) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (61/87) |
| 45% (1047/1271) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (642/734) |
| 35% (22/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 42% (16/22) |
| 21% (4/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (9/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 26% (6/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 183 | Aces Total | 63 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 233 | Total Double Faults | 70 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 157.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 210.61 |
| 56% (1519/2704) | 1st Serve % | 55% (541/986) |
| 69% (1053/1519) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (378/541) |
| 45% (532/1185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (183/445) |
| 35% (65/185) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (29/87) |
| 34% (846/2501) | Return Points Win % | 35% (344/988) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 31% (32/72) | Futures W/L | 41% (28/40) |
| 30% (31/103) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (27/68) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 30% (9/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (8/12) |
| 32% (8/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 76% (37/28) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (31/26) |
| 24% (37/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (31/5) |
| 6% (68/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (38/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
